Iraq War

LORD MANN · Post by **LORD MANN** » Wed May 16, 2007 10:40 pm

and Hitler was behind pearl harbor

nighthawk101 · Post by **nighthawk101** » Thu May 17, 2007 1:34 pm

FThompson08 wrote:They have said that many times, but liberal douches continue to skew the phrase "involved with al-Qaeda" with "SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS BEHIND 9-11!!!!!" which Pres. Bush never said.

Ok... go find me the quotes where President Bush said that Saddam was involved with Al-quaeda and it was proven.

FThompson08 · Post by **FThompson08** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:37 pm

watch the movie "Why We Fight". It is a liberal douche bag movie about how we are supposedly imperialists. However, they do show President Bush in a cabinet meeting saying that Saddam was not involved with 9-11 but was involved with al-Qaeda. However, they use to exploit a 9-11 victims dad by saying Bush lied about our reasons for goimg into Iraq.

nighthawk101 · Post by **nighthawk101** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:46 pm

Again, show me some info that proves your point... dont tell me to go watch some random movie. If you decide to post the clip, I'll look at it.

One more thing, when debating, stop referring to the opposition as douche bags or what not. It makes your argument seem ad-hominem.

Lexon Avery · Post by **Lexon Avery** » Thu May 17, 2007 8:03 pm

I don't think he called his opponit ..being you... a

FThompson08 wrote: liberal douche bag

lol, even though i do think you are slowly drifting to the dark-side lol (ME just giving you a hard time) But you are right, calling people names doesnt help your case... unless they are complete idiots like Mann, then it's all they understand.

I know when I am right about something and people think I'm wrong yet its right there in front of them to see, Ii normally wont correct them, i just give a sportish laugh like Bush, and shampoo do when questioned about things lol. But then again I'm not the leader of the free world.... or am I????

LORD MANN · Post by **LORD MANN** » Fri May 18, 2007 11:59 am

Lexon Avery wrote:unless they are complete idiots like Mann,

shampoo you Lexon and your little dog too
......................... /´¯/)
......................,/¯ ..//
...................../... ./ /
............./´¯/'...'/´¯ ¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../... ..../¨¯\
........('(...´(..´...... ,~/'...')
.........\............... ..\/..../
..........''...\......... . _.·´
............\............ ..(
..............\.......... ...\

FThompson08 · Post by **FThompson08** » Fri May 18, 2007 9:35 pm

nighthawk101 wrote:Again, show me some info that proves your point... dont tell me to go watch some random movie. If you decide to post the clip, I'll look at it.

One more thing, when debating, stop referring to the opposition as douche bags or what not. It makes your argument seem ad-hominem.

Well I don't have access to the movie, I guess I could download it and post it but it aint worth it. And I was calling the movie makers a liberal douche bag not you. I have the upmost respect for you(not your ideals).

nighthawk101 · Post by **nighthawk101** » Sat May 19, 2007 9:15 am

Im saying that anytime in a debate dont resort to ad-hominem attacks... it takes away from what point you might be trying to make.

Now, i would love you to find some substantial info solidly linking Saddam with al-quaeda.

FThompson08 · Post by **FThompson08** » Sat May 19, 2007 2:40 pm

February 19: Sudan. A handwritten note that was released by the U.S. government in 2006 as part of the Operation Iraqi Freedom documents collection suggests that a representative of Saddam's government met with bin Laden on this date. Bin Laden, according to the document, suggested "carrying out joint operations against foreign forces" in Saudi Arabia.

I'm sure you can get this document through the freedom of Information act.

Lexon Avery · Post by **Lexon Avery** » Sat May 19, 2007 2:44 pm

nighthawk101 wrote:Im saying that anytime in a debate dont resort to ad-hominem attacks... it takes away from what point you might be trying to make.

Mann shows our point, I called him an Idiot, he tells me to go shampoo off. The left has been calling the right racists, bigots, unscientific, crazy people that talk to god, Nazi's, Anit-semantics, Jack-Ass (hehe), Rich snobs, and so on and so forth... It hasn't helped their case, just like us calling them tree hugging hippies, fags, baby killers, and Communists (even if they are, sorry my US Gov. professor popped in my head) back doesn't help ours. (let alone any other insult that dont directly link a political ideas to the party like douchebag.) Thus attack logic.

Art Vandelay · Post by **Art Vandelay** » Sat May 19, 2007 8:38 pm

nighthawk101 wrote:
Now, i would love you to find some substantial info solidly linking Saddam with al-quaeda.

Done.

LORD MANN · Post by **LORD MANN** » Sat May 19, 2007 10:51 pm

Nice

and Lexon Washington was right about how political party's are bad

FThompson08 · Post by **FThompson08** » Sun May 20, 2007 12:21 pm

I guess If you present info to people that they don't like they just ignore it.

LORD MANN · Post by **LORD MANN** » Mon May 21, 2007 11:55 am

i never seen it or heard it

nighthawk101 · Post by **nighthawk101** » Mon May 21, 2007 1:04 pm

FThompson08 wrote:February 19: Sudan. A handwritten note that was released by the U.S. government in 2006 as part of the Operation Iraqi Freedom documents collection suggests that a representative of Saddam's government met with bin Laden on this date. Bin Laden, according to the document, suggested "carrying out joint operations against foreign forces" in Saudi Arabia.

I'm sure you can get this document through the freedom of Information act.

linkage please so I can check your sources.
Why is the US government is no longer using the "Saddam was linked with Al-quaeda" argument to support anything anymore if it is fact?

thefordmccord.com

Iraq War

Who is online